The Blacklist: NDAA Section 889 Prohibited Entities
The following entities are explicitly designated as “covered telecommunications equipment or services” under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Section 889 (P.L. 115-232).
Section 889(a)(1)(A) prohibits federal agencies from procuring equipment from these entities. Section 889(a)(1)(B) prohibits federal contractors from using equipment from these entities in any of their operations — regardless of whether the project is federally funded.
Primary Prohibited Entities
| Entity | Country | Sector | Legislation | Known Subsidiaries |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology | China | Video Surveillance | NDAA Sec 889, FCC Covered List | EZVIZ, HiLook |
| Zhejiang Dahua Technology | China | Video Surveillance | NDAA Sec 889, FCC Covered List | Imou, Lorex (legacy) |
| Huawei Technologies (incl. HiSilicon) | China | Telecom / Chips | NDAA Sec 889, FCC Covered List | HiSilicon |
| ZTE Corporation | China | Telecommunications | NDAA Sec 889, FCC Covered List | — |
| Hytera Communications | China | Two-Way Radio / Body Cameras | NDAA Sec 889, FCC Covered List | — |
| DJI (Da-Jiang Innovations) | China | UAV / Drones | ASDA, FCC Covered List | — |
| Autel Robotics | China | UAV / Drones | FCC Covered List | — |
The OEM Risk: What the Label Doesn’t Show
The brand on a device often does not reflect the actual manufacturer. Hikvision and Dahua produce hardware sold under dozens of Western brand names. A device with a MAC address beginning with 5C:34:5B, 64:DB:8B, 80:F5:AE, or C8:A7:02 originates from Hikvision hardware regardless of the outer label.
Use the MAC Lookup Tool for immediate OUI-based verification. See Grey Market Risks for the full analysis of OEM rebrands and high-risk brands.
The “Taint” Rule (Section 889(a)(1)(B))
This provision is widely misunderstood. A federal contractor does not need to be using banned equipment on the specific government project to be in violation. If banned cameras are installed anywhere in the contractor’s own facilities — in their lobby, warehouse, or parking lot — the contractor is in violation and cannot hold a federal contract.
This clause forces the entire defense industrial base to audit and replace banned equipment from all facilities, not just project sites.