The Banned List: NDAA Section 889 Prohibited Entities

The Blacklist: NDAA Section 889 Prohibited Entities

The following entities are explicitly designated as “covered telecommunications equipment or services” under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Section 889 (P.L. 115-232).

Section 889(a)(1)(A) prohibits federal agencies from procuring equipment from these entities. Section 889(a)(1)(B) prohibits federal contractors from using equipment from these entities in any of their operations — regardless of whether the project is federally funded.

Primary Prohibited Entities

EntityCountrySectorLegislationKnown Subsidiaries
Hangzhou Hikvision Digital TechnologyChinaVideo SurveillanceNDAA Sec 889, FCC Covered ListEZVIZ, HiLook
Zhejiang Dahua TechnologyChinaVideo SurveillanceNDAA Sec 889, FCC Covered ListImou, Lorex (legacy)
Huawei Technologies (incl. HiSilicon)ChinaTelecom / ChipsNDAA Sec 889, FCC Covered ListHiSilicon
ZTE CorporationChinaTelecommunicationsNDAA Sec 889, FCC Covered List
Hytera CommunicationsChinaTwo-Way Radio / Body CamerasNDAA Sec 889, FCC Covered List
DJI (Da-Jiang Innovations)ChinaUAV / DronesASDA, FCC Covered List
Autel RoboticsChinaUAV / DronesFCC Covered List

The OEM Risk: What the Label Doesn’t Show

The brand on a device often does not reflect the actual manufacturer. Hikvision and Dahua produce hardware sold under dozens of Western brand names. A device with a MAC address beginning with 5C:34:5B, 64:DB:8B, 80:F5:AE, or C8:A7:02 originates from Hikvision hardware regardless of the outer label.

Use the MAC Lookup Tool for immediate OUI-based verification. See Grey Market Risks for the full analysis of OEM rebrands and high-risk brands.

The “Taint” Rule (Section 889(a)(1)(B))

This provision is widely misunderstood. A federal contractor does not need to be using banned equipment on the specific government project to be in violation. If banned cameras are installed anywhere in the contractor’s own facilities — in their lobby, warehouse, or parking lot — the contractor is in violation and cannot hold a federal contract.

This clause forces the entire defense industrial base to audit and replace banned equipment from all facilities, not just project sites.